Back to Search Start Over

Diagnostic accuracy of C-arm CT during selective transcatheter angiography for hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison with intravenous contrast-enhanced, biphasic, dynamic MDCT.

Authors :
Higashihara, Hiroki
Osuga, Keigo
Onishi, Hiromitsu
Nakamoto, Atsushi
Tsuboyama, Takahiro
Maeda, Noboru
Hori, Masatoshi
Kim, Tonsok
Tomiyama, Noriyuki
Source :
European Radiology. Apr2012, Vol. 22 Issue 4, p872-879. 8p.
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

Purpose: This study was aimed to compare the accuracy, sensitivity, and positive predictive value of C-arm CT (CACT) during selective transcatheter angiography with those of multidetector CT (MDCT) in the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Material and methods: In this prospective study, 30 patients (mean age, 73 years) with unresectable HCC were examined with CACT before chemoembolisation. Images of a combination of CACT during arterial portography (CACTAP) and dual-phase CACT during hepatic arteriography (CACTHA) was obtained and images of intravenous contrast-enhanced, biphasic, dynamic, MDCT was also obtained beforehand. Three blinded observers independently reviewed CACT and MDCT. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by the alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic (AFROC) method. Sensitivities and positive predictive values (PPV) were analyzed with the paired t-test. Results: In the mean area under the AFROC curve (Az), there was no significant difference between MDCT and CACT (MDCT, mean Az value, 0.83; CACT, 0.85, respectively) ( P = 0.32). There was also no significant difference between the two techniques in sensitivity (MDCT, mean 0.65; CACT, 0.60) and PPV (MDCT, mean 0.98; CACT, 0.97) ( P = 0.40, P = 0.68, respectively). Conclusion: The diagnostic accuracy of CACT was equivalent to that of biphasic CT in the diagnosis of HCC. Key Points: [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09387994
Volume :
22
Issue :
4
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
European Radiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
72899344
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2324-y