Response to the paper: ‘‘Conformation kinetics of methyl nitrite. IV’’.

Our measurements of the relaxation times for the syn–anti isomerization of CH3ONO have been criticized by True et al. However, their recounting of the flaws in our procedure was based on distortions. Furthermore, the basic disagreement concerns the interpretation of the pressure dependence of the relaxation times they reported which differed insignificantly from our initial observations. The clear increase with decreasing pressure of the bimolecular rate constant (at low pressures) is not consistent with any RRKM model which has yet been proposed contrary to the claim by True. It is consistent with the limited phase space model proposed by Bauer and Lazaar. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]