Back to Search
Start Over
Ten ironic rules for non-statistical reviewers
- Source :
-
NeuroImage . Jul2012, Vol. 61 Issue 4, p1300-1310. 11p. - Publication Year :
- 2012
-
Abstract
- Abstract: As an expert reviewer, it is sometimes necessary to ensure a paper is rejected. This can sometimes be achieved by highlighting improper statistical practice. This technical note provides guidance on how to critique the statistical analysis of neuroimaging studies to maximise the chance that the paper will be declined. We will review a series of critiques that can be applied universally to any neuroimaging paper and consider responses to potential rebuttals that reviewers might encounter from authors or editors. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 10538119
- Volume :
- 61
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- NeuroImage
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 76609961
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.018