Back to Search Start Over

Child support receipt: Does context matter? A comparative analysis of Colombia and the United States

Authors :
Cuesta, Laura
Meyer, Daniel R.
Source :
Children & Youth Services Review. Sep2012, Vol. 34 Issue 9, p1876-1883. 8p.
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

Abstract: Due to the high incidence of poverty among custodial-parent families, most countries have a variety of policies designed to increase these families'' income security, including child support. However, despite policy efforts, in a wide range of countries the majority of custodial-parent families do not receive these transfers. Does this suggest that a low receipt rate is a core issue of child support policy across contexts? To explore this question, this paper focuses on child support receipt in two very different countries, Colombia and the United States. The overarching question is whether the country of residence is associated with the likelihood of child support receipt. The Colombian 2008 Quality of Life Survey and the U.S. 2008 Current Population Survey‐Child Support Supplement provide information on 6751 custodial mothers. Based on a series of probit models, our study shows that living in the U.S. is associated with an increase in the likelihood of child support receipt. However, once we control for custodial mother''s characteristics, the marginal effect of country of residence decreases significantly, and variables such as custodial mother''s education and income quintile become important as well. These findings suggest that in both countries custodial mothers have similar issues when it comes to receiving financial support from their children''s father, despite the differences in economic development and attention to child support policy in Colombia and the U.S. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01907409
Volume :
34
Issue :
9
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Children & Youth Services Review
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
77730505
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.05.023