Back to Search Start Over

Impact of lopinavir/ritonavir use on antiretroviral resistance in recent clinical practice.

Authors :
Lambert-Niclot, Sidonie
Masquelier, Bernard
Cohen Codar, Isabelle
Soulie, Cathia
Delaugerre, Constance
Morand-Joubert, Laurence
Charpentier, Charlotte
Ferre, Virginie
Plantier, Jean-Christophe
Montes, Brigitte
Carret, Sophie
Perrot, Valerie
Peytavin, Gilles
Costagliola, Dominique
Calvez, Vincent
Marcelin, Anne-Geneviève
Source :
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC). Oct2012, Vol. 67 Issue 10, p2487-2493. 7p.
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

Objectives This observational study was requested by French health authorities to determine the impact of lopinavir/ritonavir (Kaletra®) on antiretroviral resistance in clinical practice. Virological failures of lopinavir/ritonavir and their effects on the resistance to protease inhibitors and reverse transcriptase inhibitors were evaluated in protease inhibitor-experienced patients. Patients and methods Virological failure was defined as an HIV-1 plasma viral load >50 copies/mL after at least 3 months of lopinavir/ritonavir-containing antiretroviral therapy. For all patients, a resistance genotypic test was available at failure and before lopinavir/ritonavir treatment. Data from 72 patients with inclusion criteria were studied. Results The mean viral load at baseline was 4 log10 copies/mL (1.6–6.5). Mutations in the protease gene significantly selected between baseline and failure were L10V, K20R, L33F, M36I, I47V, I54V, A71V and I85V (P < 0.05). Patients who had more than seven protease inhibitor mutations at baseline showed a significantly increased risk of occurrence of protease inhibitor mutations. The proportion of viruses susceptible to atazanavir, fosamprenavir and darunavir decreased significantly between baseline and failure (P < 0.05). Among patients with a virus susceptible to atazanavir at day 0, 26% (n = 14) exhibited a virus resistant or possibly resistant at the time of failure. This proportion was 32% (n = 16) for fosamprenavir and 16% (n = 7) for darunavir. Conclusions A darunavir-based regimen appears to be a sequential option in the case of lopinavir/ritonavir failure. To compare and determine the best treatment sequencing, similar studies should be performed for darunavir/ritonavir and atazanavir/ritonavir. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03057453
Volume :
67
Issue :
10
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
80236776