Back to Search Start Over

An Evaluation of Current Services Available for People Diagnosed with Head and Neck Cancer in the UK (2009–2010)

Authors :
Hughes, C.
Homer, J.
Bradley, P.
Nutting, C.
Ness, A.
Persson, M.
Jeffreys, M.
Waylen, A.
Leary, S.
Thomas, S.
Source :
Clinical Oncology. Dec2012, Vol. 24 Issue 10, pe187-e192. 0p.
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

Abstract: Aims: To evaluate current care and service provision for people with head and neck cancer in the UK. Materials and Methods: Self-report questionnaires for cancer networks, clinical leads of oncology units and leads for multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) were designed. These questionnaires were based on a previous survey. Questionnaires were sent out between 2009 and 2010. Results: Questionnaires were received from all networks (n = 37), most oncology units (48 of 53) and most MDTs (51 of 63). Care for people with head and neck cancer is increasingly being provided by a centralised MDT. The membership of these teams varies; facilities available for team meetings are fit for purpose in most cases. MDTs are meeting frequently (weekly meetings in 96%) and discussing on average 18 cases at each meeting (95% confidence interval 15–21 cases). Most oncologists have access to all common anti-cancer drugs and most have access to all forms of radiotherapy. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy is not yet available in some oncology units (28%). A small number of units have only one oncologist (13%). Despite audit and research being part of the rationale for MDT working, regular discussion of morbidity and mortality is unusual (40%) and use of a database to record decisions is not universal. Only seven centres record decisions into the Data for Head and Neck Oncology database. Reported recruitment to studies is generally low (<2% of cases enrolled in studies in 62%). Conclusions: Head and neck cancer care is increasingly provided through a centralised MDT. Increased resources and further changes in practice are required to implement current National Health Service cancer policy. Teams need to improve recording of their decision-making, discuss morbidity and mortality and support recruitment to clinical studies. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09366555
Volume :
24
Issue :
10
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Clinical Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
83166924
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2012.07.005