Cite
Why the (gene) counting argument fails in the massive modularity debate: The need for understanding gene concepts and genotype-phenotype relationships.
MLA
Plaisance, KathrynS., et al. “Why the (Gene) Counting Argument Fails in the Massive Modularity Debate: The Need for Understanding Gene Concepts and Genotype-Phenotype Relationships.” Philosophical Psychology, vol. 25, no. 6, Dec. 2012, pp. 873–92. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2011.616268.
APA
Plaisance, K., Reydon, T. C., & Elgin, M. (2012). Why the (gene) counting argument fails in the massive modularity debate: The need for understanding gene concepts and genotype-phenotype relationships. Philosophical Psychology, 25(6), 873–892. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2011.616268
Chicago
Plaisance, KathrynS., ThomasA. C. Reydon, and Mehmet Elgin. 2012. “Why the (Gene) Counting Argument Fails in the Massive Modularity Debate: The Need for Understanding Gene Concepts and Genotype-Phenotype Relationships.” Philosophical Psychology 25 (6): 873–92. doi:10.1080/09515089.2011.616268.