Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of the performance of IFA, CFA, and ELISA assays for the serodiagnosis of acute Q fever by quality assessment

Authors :
Herremans, Tineke
Hogema, Boris M.
Nabuurs, Marrigje
Peeters, Marcel
Wegdam-Blans, Marjolijn
Schneeberger, Peter
Nijhuis, Carla
Notermans, Daan W.
Galama, Joep
Horrevorts, Anton
van Loo, Inge H.M.
Vlaminckx, Bart
Zaaijer, Hans L.
Koopmans, Marion P.
Berkhout, Hanneke
Socolovschi, Cristina
Raoult, Didier
Stenos, John
Nicholson, William
Bijlmer, Henk
Source :
Diagnostic Microbiology & Infectious Disease. Jan2013, Vol. 75 Issue 1, p16-21. 6p.
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

Abstract: The indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) is considered the reference method for diagnosing Q fever, but serology is also performed by complement fixation assay (CFA) or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). However, comparability between these assays is not clear, and therefore a quality assessment was performed. A total of 25 serum samples from negative controls, Q fever patients, and a serial diluted high-positive sample were analyzed in 10 Dutch laboratories. Six laboratories performed CFA, 5 performed IFA, and 5 performed ELISAs. Three international reference laboratories from Australia, France, and the USA also participated in this study. Qualitative values between laboratories using the same methods were within close range, and all 3 methods correctly identified acute Q fever patients. The IFA, ELISA, and CFA are all suitable serodiagnostic assays to diagnose acute Q fever, but the IFA remains an important tool in the follow-up of patients and in identifying patients at risk for developing chronic Q fever. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
07328893
Volume :
75
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Diagnostic Microbiology & Infectious Disease
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
84157328
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.09.001