Cite
How THE CONSTITUTIONS OF THE THIRTY-SEVEN STATES IN EFFECT WHEN THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT WAS ADOPTED DEMONSTRATE THAT THE GOVERNMENTAL ENDORSEMENT TEST IN ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE JURISPRUDENCE IS CONTRARY TO AMERICAN HISTORY AND TRADITION.
MLA
Getchell Jr., E.Duncan, and Michael H. Brady. “How THE CONSTITUTIONS OF THE THIRTY-SEVEN STATES IN EFFECT WHEN THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT WAS ADOPTED DEMONSTRATE THAT THE GOVERNMENTAL ENDORSEMENT TEST IN ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE JURISPRUDENCE IS CONTRARY TO AMERICAN HISTORY AND TRADITION.” Texas Review of Law & Politics, vol. 17, no. 1, Fall 2012, pp. 125–84. EBSCOhost, widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=asx&AN=85851746&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.
APA
Getchell Jr., E. D., & Brady, M. H. (2012). How THE CONSTITUTIONS OF THE THIRTY-SEVEN STATES IN EFFECT WHEN THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT WAS ADOPTED DEMONSTRATE THAT THE GOVERNMENTAL ENDORSEMENT TEST IN ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE JURISPRUDENCE IS CONTRARY TO AMERICAN HISTORY AND TRADITION. Texas Review of Law & Politics, 17(1), 125–184.
Chicago
Getchell Jr., E. Duncan, and Michael H. Brady. 2012. “How THE CONSTITUTIONS OF THE THIRTY-SEVEN STATES IN EFFECT WHEN THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT WAS ADOPTED DEMONSTRATE THAT THE GOVERNMENTAL ENDORSEMENT TEST IN ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE JURISPRUDENCE IS CONTRARY TO AMERICAN HISTORY AND TRADITION.” Texas Review of Law & Politics 17 (1): 125–84. http://widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=asx&AN=85851746&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.