Back to Search Start Over

A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway and PAXpress TM for short surgical procedures.

Authors :
Ahmed, S. M.
Maroof, M.
Khan, R. M.
Singhal, V.
Rizvi, K. A.
Source :
Anaesthesia. Jan2003, Vol. 58 Issue 1, p42-44. 3p.
Publication Year :
2003

Abstract

Summary Sixty adult patients undergoing minor peripheral surgery under general anaesthesia were randomly allocated to receive either the laryngeal mask airway (laryngeal mask airway; size 4 for females and size 5 for males) or the PAXpress TM (adult size), inserted by a single operator with experience of > 50 insertions of each device. The laryngeal mask airway was correctly placed on the first attempt in 27 patients (90%) compared with 20 patients (67%) when using the PA Xpress (p < 0.01). No patient required more than two attempts at insertion and there were no failures with the laryngeal mask airway, compared with four (13%) who needed three attempts and two failures (7%) with the PA Xpress (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively). Mean (SD) total placement time was shorter with the laryngeal mask airway [24.6 (3.1) s] than with the PA Xpress [35.4 (2.5) s; p < 0.01]. The most common complication was sore throat, which occurred less frequently with the laryngeal mask airway (8 patients; 26%) than with the PA Xpress (15 patients; 53.5%; p < 0.001). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00032409
Volume :
58
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Anaesthesia
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
8742072
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.02867.x