Back to Search
Start Over
A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway and PAXpress TM for short surgical procedures.
- Source :
-
Anaesthesia . Jan2003, Vol. 58 Issue 1, p42-44. 3p. - Publication Year :
- 2003
-
Abstract
- Summary Sixty adult patients undergoing minor peripheral surgery under general anaesthesia were randomly allocated to receive either the laryngeal mask airway (laryngeal mask airway; size 4 for females and size 5 for males) or the PAXpress TM (adult size), inserted by a single operator with experience of > 50 insertions of each device. The laryngeal mask airway was correctly placed on the first attempt in 27 patients (90%) compared with 20 patients (67%) when using the PA Xpress (p < 0.01). No patient required more than two attempts at insertion and there were no failures with the laryngeal mask airway, compared with four (13%) who needed three attempts and two failures (7%) with the PA Xpress (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively). Mean (SD) total placement time was shorter with the laryngeal mask airway [24.6 (3.1) s] than with the PA Xpress [35.4 (2.5) s; p < 0.01]. The most common complication was sore throat, which occurred less frequently with the laryngeal mask airway (8 patients; 26%) than with the PA Xpress (15 patients; 53.5%; p < 0.001). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- *SURGERY
*ANESTHESIA
*AIRWAY (Anatomy)
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00032409
- Volume :
- 58
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- Anaesthesia
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 8742072
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.02867.x