Comparing accountability relationships between governments and non-state actors in Canadian and European international development policy.

This article examines the alignment of different governance arrangements and alternative accountability mechanisms in international development policy making in Canada and the European Union ( EU), with a particular focus on relationships between governments and non-governmental organizations. The Canadian case illustrates an entrepreneurial mode of governance that aligns with fiscal auditing and performance management mechanisms, while the networked governance model of the EU relies more heavily on accountability instruments of public reporting and deliberation. The article concludes that the European accountability regime likely provides policy makers with more opportunities for social policy learning but would be difficult to implement in Canada given the underlying action logic of the federal government. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]