Reply to Mould and Duncan on pornography research: Some important issues for psychology.

Identifies some distortions in the comments of Mould and of Duncan concerning the author's earlier criticism of Linz, Donnerstein, and Penrod (1987) and of Wilcox (1987), and their articles concerning the effects of pornography. Argument that his paper did not endorse the findings of the Meese Commission; Suggested negative effects of pornography, including less positive attitudes toward women; Details.