Back to Search Start Over

Ischemic Postconditioning During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors :
Joo-Yong Hahn
Young Bin Song
Eun Kyoung Kim
Cheol Woong Yu
Jang-Whan Bae
Woo-Young Chung
Seung-Hyuk Choi
Jin-Ho Choi
Jang-Ho Bae
Kyung Joo An
Jong-Seon Park
Ju Hyeon Oh
Sang-Wook Kim
Jin-Yong Hwang
Jae Kean Ryu
Hun Sik Park
Do-Sun Lim
Hyeon-Cheol Gwon
Source :
Circulation. 10/22/2013, Vol. 128 Issue 17, p1889-1896. 8p.
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

Background--Ischemic postconditioning has been reported to reduce infarct size in patients with ST-segment--elevation myocardial infarction. However, cardioprotective effects of postconditioning have not been demonstrated in a large-scale trial. Methods and Results--We performed a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end-point trial. A total of 700 patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment--elevation myocardial infarction within 12 hours after symptom onset were randomly assigned to the postconditioning group or to the conventional primary PCI group in a 1:1 ratio. Postconditioning was performed immediately after restoration of coronary low as follows: The angioplasty balloon was positioned at the culprit lesion and inflated 4 times for 1 minute with low-pressure (<6 atm) inflations, each separated by 1 minute of deflation. The primary end point was complete ST-segment resolution (percentage resolution of ST-segment elevation >70%) measured at 30 minutes after PCI. Complete ST-segment resolution occurred in 40.5% of patients in the postconditioning group and 41.5% of patients in the conventional PCI group (absolute difference, -1.0%; 95% confidence interval, -8.4 to 6.4; P=0.79). The rate of myocardial blush grade of 0 or 1 and the rate of major adverse cardiac events (a composite of death, myocardial infarction, severe heart failure, or stent thrombosis) at 30 days did not differ significantly between the postconditioning group and the conventional PCI group (17.2% versus 22.4% [P=0.20] and 4.3% versus 3.7% [P=0.70], respectively). Conclusion--Ischemic postconditioning did not improve myocardial reperfusion in patients with ST-segment--elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary PCI with current standard practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00097322
Volume :
128
Issue :
17
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Circulation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
91613083
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001690