Cite
Differential impact on post-transplant outcomes between pulsatile- and continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.
MLA
Ventura, Pere A., et al. “Differential Impact on Post-Transplant Outcomes between Pulsatile- and Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.” Clinical Transplantation, vol. 25, no. 4, July 2011, pp. E390–95. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0012.2011.01433.x.
APA
Ventura, P. A., Alharethi, R., Budge, D., Reid, B. B., Horne, B. D., Mason, N. O., Stoker, S., Caine, W. T., Rasmusson, B., Doty, J., Clayson, S. E., & Kfoury, A. G. (2011). Differential impact on post-transplant outcomes between pulsatile- and continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. Clinical Transplantation, 25(4), E390–E395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0012.2011.01433.x
Chicago
Ventura, Pere A., Rami Alharethi, Deborah Budge, Bruce B. Reid, Benjamin D. Horne, Nathan O. Mason, Sandi Stoker, et al. 2011. “Differential Impact on Post-Transplant Outcomes between Pulsatile- and Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.” Clinical Transplantation 25 (4): E390–95. doi:10.1111/j.1399-0012.2011.01433.x.