Back to Search Start Over

Variation in detection of ductal carcinoma in situ during screening mammography: A survey within the International Cancer Screening Network.

Authors :
Lynge, Elsebeth
Ponti, Antonio
James, Ted
Májek, Ondřej
von Euler-Chelpin, My
Anttila, Ahti
Fitzpatrick, Patricia
Frigerio, Alfonso
Kawai, Masaaki
Scharpantgen, Astrid
Broeders, Mireille
Hofvind, Solveig
Vidal, Carmen
Ederra, Maria
Salas, Dolores
Bulliard, Jean-Luc
Tomatis, Mariano
Kerlikowske, Karla
Taplin, Stephen
Source :
European Journal of Cancer. Jan2014, Vol. 50 Issue 1, p185-192. 8p.
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

Abstract: Background: There is concern about detection of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in screening mammography. DCIS accounts for a substantial proportion of screen-detected lesions but its effect on breast cancer mortality is debated. The International Cancer Screening Network conducted a comparative analysis to determine variation in DCIS detection. Patients and Methods: Data were collected during 2004–2008 on number of screening examinations, detected breast cancers, DCIS cases and Globocan 2008 breast cancer incidence rates derived from national or regional cancer registers. We calculated screen-detection rates for breast cancers and DCIS. Results: Data were obtained from 15 screening settings in 12 countries; 7,176,050 screening examinations; 29,605 breast cancers and 5324 DCIS cases. The ratio between highest and lowest breast cancer incidence was 2.88 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.76–3.00); 2.97 (95% CI 2.51–3.51) for detection of breast cancer; and 3.49 (95% CI 2.70–4.51) for detection of DCIS. Conclusions: Considerable international variation was found in DCIS detection. This variation could not be fully explained by variation in incidence nor in breast cancer detection rates. It suggests the potential for wide discrepancies in management of DCIS resulting in overtreatment of indolent DCIS or undertreatment of potentially curable disease. Comprehensive cancer registration is needed to monitor DCIS detection. Efforts to understand discrepancies and standardise management may improve care. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09598049
Volume :
50
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
European Journal of Cancer
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
93334192
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2013.08.013