Back to Search
Start Over
Predicting reading outcomes with progress monitoring slopes among middle grade students.
- Source :
-
Learning & Individual Differences . Feb2014, Vol. 30, p46-57. 12p. - Publication Year :
- 2014
-
Abstract
- Abstract: Effective implementation of response-to-intervention (RTI) frameworks depends on efficient tools for monitoring progress. Evaluations of growth (i.e., slope) may be less efficient than evaluations of status at a single time point, especially if slopes do not add to predictions of outcomes over status. We examined progress monitoring slope validity for predicting reading outcomes among middle school students by evaluating latent growth models for different progress monitoring measure–outcome combinations. We used multi-group modeling to evaluate the effects of reading ability, reading intervention, and progress monitoring administration condition on slope validity. Slope validity was greatest when progress monitoring was aligned with the outcome (i.e., word reading fluency slope was used to predict fluency outcomes in contrast to comprehension outcomes), but effects varied across administration conditions (viz., repeated reading of familiar vs. novel passages). Unless the progress monitoring measure is highly aligned with outcome, slope may be an inefficient method for evaluating progress in an RTI context. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 10416080
- Volume :
- 30
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- Learning & Individual Differences
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 94907030
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.11.001