Back to Search Start Over

Salivary glands harbor more diverse microbial communities than gut in Anopheles culicifacies.

Authors :
Sharma, Punita
Sharma, Swati
Maurya, Rakesh Kumar
Tanwee Das De
Thomas, Tina
Lata, Suman
Singh, Namita
Pandey, Kailash Chand
Valecha, Neena
Dixit, Rajnikant
Source :
Parasites & Vectors. 2014, Vol. 7 Issue 1, p1-14. 14p.
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

Background In recent years, it has been well documented that gut flora not only influence mosquito physiology, but also significantly alter vector competency. Although, salivary gland and gut constitute key partners of the digestive system, it is still believed that salivary glands may harbor less flora than gut (Parasit Vectors 6: 146, 2013). Methods Using a metagenomic approach, we have identified for the first time the diverse microbial community associated with these two physiologically different tissues of the digestive system in the mosquito Anopheles culicifacies. Results A total of 17 different phyla could be assigned to the whole metagenomic dataset, predominated by the phylum Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteriodetes, Tenericutes and Actinomycetes. Common bacteria included the members of Enhydrobacter, Agromonas, Serratia, Ralsonia, Lactobacillus, Pseudomonas, Streptococcus, Rubrobacter, Anaerococcus, Methylobacterium, Turicibacter, Elizabethkingia etc. in both the tissues representing 'core microbiota' of the mosquito digestive system. Salivary associated unique bacterial community included the members of Chloriflexi, Chlorobi, Cyanobacteria, Nitrospira, TM7, Armatimonadetes, Planctomycetes, Fibrobacteres etc. Conclusion We find that the salivary gland microbial community structure is more diverse than gut of the mosquito, probably due to differential feeding associated engagements such as food acquisition, ingestion and digestion processes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17563305
Volume :
7
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Parasites & Vectors
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
96360649
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-235