Back to Search Start Over

Religious Magnanimity: Reminding People of Their Religious Belief System Reduces Hostility After Threat.

Authors :
Schumann, Karina
McGregor, Ian
Nash, Kyle A.
Ross, Michael
Source :
Journal of Personality & Social Psychology. Sep2014, Vol. 107 Issue 3, p432-453. 22p.
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

The present research tested the hypothesis that many people's ambient religious beliefs are non-hostile and magnanimous by assessing whether reminding people of their religious belief systems would reduce hostility after threat. Across religious affiliations, participants reported that their religious belief systems encourage magnanimous behavior. In addition, priming their religious belief systems caused them to act more magnanimously, but only when motivated to adhere to salient ideals (i.e., after threats; see Gailliot, Stillman, Schmeichel, Maner, & Plant, 2008; Jonas et al., 2008). Specifically, in Studies 1-5, we found that a general religious belief system prime ("Which religious belief system do you identify with?") reduced the hostility of people's thoughts, behaviors, and judgments following threat. In Studies 6 and 7, we found that the religious belief system prime only reduced hostile reactions to threat among participants who held religious beliefs that oriented them toward magnanimous ideals (Study 6) and who were dispositionally inclined to adhere to their ideals (Study 7). In Study 8, we found support for the role of magnanimous ideals by demonstrating that directly priming these ideals yielded effects similar to those produced by a religious belief system prime. These studies provide consistent evidence that, by invoking magnanimous ideals, a religious belief system prime promotes less hostile responses to threat. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00223514
Volume :
107
Issue :
3
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Personality & Social Psychology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
97633807
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036739