Back to Search Start Over

Challenges in Developing a Validated Biomarker for Angiogenesis Inhibitors: The Motesanib Experience.

Authors :
Bass, Michael B.
Yao, Bin
Hei, Yong-Jiang
Ye, Yining
Davis, Gerard J.
Davis, Michael T.
Kaesdorf, Barbara A.
Chan, Sabrina S.
Patterson, Scott D.
Source :
PLoS ONE. Oct2014, Vol. 9 Issue 10, p1-11. 11p.
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

Purpose: We sought to develop placental growth factor as a predictive pharmacodynamic biomarker for motesanib efficacy as first-line therapy in patients with advanced nonsquamous non–small-cell lung cancer. Experimental Design: Placental growth factor was evaluated at baseline and study week 4 (after 3 weeks treatment) in an exploratory analysis of data from a randomized phase 2 study of motesanib 125 mg once daily plus carboplatin/paclitaxel and in a prespecified analysis of data from a randomized, double-blind phase 3 study of motesanib 125 mg once daily plus carboplatin/paclitaxel vs placebo plus carboplatin/paclitaxel (MONET1). Associations between fold-change from baseline in placental growth factor and overall survival were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models. Results: In the phase 2 study, serum placental growth factor increased from baseline a mean 2.8-fold at study week 4. Patients with ≥2.2-fold change from baseline in placental growth factor (n = 18) had significantly longer overall survival than those with <2.2-fold change (n = 19; 22.9 vs 7.9 months; hazard ratio, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.12–0.74; P = 0.009). Consequently, placental growth factor was investigated as a pharmacodynamic biomarker in the phase 3 MONET1 study. There was no association between log-transformed placental growth factor fold-change from baseline to week 4 (continuous variable) and overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.79–1.22; P = 0.868). MONET1 did not meet its primary endpoint of overall survival. Likewise, median overall survival was similar among patients with ≥2.0-fold change in placental growth factor (n = 229) compared with <2.0-fold change (n = 127; 14.8 vs 13.8 months; hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.67–1.15, P = 0.340). Conclusions: Our results illustrate the challenges of successfully translating phase 2 biomarker results into phase 3 studies. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19326203
Volume :
9
Issue :
10
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
PLoS ONE
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
99199188
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108048