Back to Search Start Over

Research paper. Tobacco industry marketing to low socioeconomic status women in the USA.

Authors :
Brown-Johnson, Cati G.
England, Lucinda J.
Glantz, Stanton A.
Ling, Pamela M.
Source :
Tobacco Control. Nov2014 Supplement, Vol. 23 Issue S1, pe139-e146. 8p. 1 Color Photograph, 1 Black and White Photograph, 1 Diagram.
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Describe tobacco companies' marketing strategies targeting low socioeconomic status (SES) females in the USA. METHODS: Analysis of previously secret tobacco industry documents. RESULTS: Tobacco companies focused marketing on low SES women starting in the late 1970s, including military wives, low-income inner-city minority women, 'discount-susceptible' older female smokers and less-educated young white women. Strategies included distributing discount coupons with food stamps to reach the very poor, discount offers at point-of-sale and via direct mail to keep cigarette prices low, developing new brands for low SES females and promoting luxury images to low SES African-American women. More recently, companies integrated promotional strategies targeting low-income women into marketing plans for established brands. CONCLUSIONS: Tobacco companies used numerous marketing strategies to reach low SES females in the USA for at least four decades. Strategies to counteract marketing to low SES women could include (1) counteracting price discounts and direct mail coupons that reduce the price of tobacco products, (2) instituting restrictions on point-of-sale advertising and retail display and (3) creating counteradvertising that builds resistance to psychosocial targeting of low SES women. To achieve health equity, tobacco control efforts are needed to counteract the influence of tobacco industry marketing to low-income women. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09644563
Volume :
23
Issue :
S1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Tobacco Control
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
99437520
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051224