Back to Search
Start Over
One-year clinical outcomes and relative costs of primary infarct artery stenting versus angioplasty following systemic thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction.
- Source :
-
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions [Catheter Cardiovasc Interv] 2000 Feb; Vol. 49 (2), pp. 135-41. - Publication Year :
- 2000
-
Abstract
- We investigated the clinical effectiveness and relative cost of two different infarct artery revascularization strategies in patients following systemic thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction. The clinical efficacy and relative cost of stenting and angioplasty have not been investigated in patients requiring infarct artery revascularization after systemic thrombolysis for myocardial infarction. We prospectively enrolled 220 consecutive patients who received thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction and were subsequently treated with either angioplasty or primary stenting of the infarct artery. In-hospital and 1-year clinical outcomes, including death, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization, and total hospital costs over the 1-year study period were assessed. Compared to angioplasty, primary stenting resulted in lower in-hospital mortality (4% vs. 0%; P = 0.01) and reduced rates of repeat percutaneous or surgical revascularization (7% vs. 0%; P = 0.0009). At 1-year follow-up, stenting was associated with a lower death rate (6.25% vs. 0%; P = 0.002) and reduced repeat infarct artery revascularization (11% vs. 27%; P = 0. 001). Initial hospitalization costs were higher in the stent group ($11,818 +/- $3,377 vs. $9,723 +/- $8,661; P = 0.014) due primarily to catheterization laboratory-related expenditures ($7,346 +/- $2, 395 vs. $3,567 +/- $1,212; P = 0.0001). However, the cumulative 1-year medical cost difference between the two groups was not significant ($13,938 +/- $5,939 vs. $12,914 +/- $9,308; P = 0.33). Following thrombolytic therapy, primary infarct artery stenting reduced in-hospital and 1-year mortality and revascularization rates compared to angioplasty. Stenting was associated with higher initial hospital costs, which were off-set by lower revascularization rates, resulting in comparable total hospitalization costs after 1 year. These findings have important clinical and economic implications in an increasingly cost-conscious health care environment. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 49:135-141, 2000.<br /> (Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)
- Subjects :
- Coronary Angiography
Female
Hospital Mortality
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial Infarction diagnostic imaging
Myocardial Infarction mortality
Recurrence
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary economics
Hospital Costs
Myocardial Infarction economics
Myocardial Infarction therapy
Stents economics
Thrombolytic Therapy economics
Thrombolytic Therapy mortality
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1522-1946
- Volume :
- 49
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 10642759
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1522-726x(200002)49:2<135::aid-ccd4>3.0.co;2-b