Cite
Comparison of independent component analysis and conventional hypothesis-driven analysis for clinical functional MR image processing.
MLA
Quigley, Michelle A., et al. “Comparison of Independent Component Analysis and Conventional Hypothesis-Driven Analysis for Clinical Functional MR Image Processing.” AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 23, no. 1, Jan. 2002, pp. 49–58. EBSCOhost, widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=cmedm&AN=11827875&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.
APA
Quigley, M. A., Haughton, V. M., Carew, J., Cordes, D., Moritz, C. H., & Meyerand, M. E. (2002). Comparison of independent component analysis and conventional hypothesis-driven analysis for clinical functional MR image processing. AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 23(1), 49–58.
Chicago
Quigley, Michelle A, Victor M Haughton, John Carew, Dietmar Cordes, Chad H Moritz, and M Elizabeth Meyerand. 2002. “Comparison of Independent Component Analysis and Conventional Hypothesis-Driven Analysis for Clinical Functional MR Image Processing.” AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology 23 (1): 49–58. http://widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=cmedm&AN=11827875&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.