Back to Search
Start Over
All-cause mortality in randomized trials of cancer screening.
- Source :
-
Journal of the National Cancer Institute [J Natl Cancer Inst] 2002 Feb 06; Vol. 94 (3), pp. 167-73. - Publication Year :
- 2002
-
Abstract
- Background: The most widely accepted end point in randomized cancer screening trials is disease-specific mortality. The validity of this end point, however, rests on the assumption that cause of death can be determined accurately. An alternative end point is all-cause mortality, which depends only on the accurate ascertainment of deaths and when they occur. We compared disease-specific and all-cause mortality in published randomized cancer-screening trials to indirectly assess the validity of the disease-specific mortality end point.<br />Methods: We examined all 12 published randomized trials of cancer screening for which both end points were available (seven of mammography, three of fecal occult blood detection, and two of chest x-ray screening for lung cancer). For each randomized trial, we subtracted disease-specific mortality observed in the screened group from that observed in the control group and all-cause mortality in the screened group from that in the control group. We then compared the differences in these two mortality measures.<br />Results: In five of the 12 trials, differences in the two mortality rates went in opposite directions, suggesting opposite effects of screening. In four of these five trials, disease-specific mortality was lower in the screened group than in the control group, whereas all-cause mortality was the same or higher. In two of the remaining seven trials, the mortality rate differences were in the same direction but their magnitudes were inconsistent; i.e., the difference in all-cause mortality exceeded the disease-specific mortality in the control group. Thus, results of seven of the 12 trials were inconsistent in their direction or magnitude.<br />Conclusion: Major inconsistencies were identified in disease-specific and all-cause mortality end points in randomized cancer screening trials. Because all-cause mortality is not affected by bias in classifying the cause of death, it should be examined when interpreting the results of randomized cancer-screening trials.
- Subjects :
- Bias
Breast Neoplasms diagnosis
Colorectal Neoplasms diagnosis
Disease Susceptibility diagnosis
Feces chemistry
Female
Humans
Lung Neoplasms diagnosis
Lung Neoplasms diagnostic imaging
Male
Mammography statistics & numerical data
Neoplasms epidemiology
Occult Blood
Reproducibility of Results
Survival Rate
Cause of Death
Mass Screening methods
Neoplasms diagnosis
Neoplasms mortality
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic methods
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 0027-8874
- Volume :
- 94
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 11830606
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/94.3.167