Cite
Comparison of an aggregate scoring method with a consensus scoring method in a measure of clinical reasoning capacity.
MLA
Charlin, Bernard, et al. “Comparison of an Aggregate Scoring Method with a Consensus Scoring Method in a Measure of Clinical Reasoning Capacity.” Teaching and Learning in Medicine, vol. 14, no. 3, Summer 2002, pp. 150–56. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328015TLM1403_3.
APA
Charlin, B., Desaulniers, M., Gagnon, R., Blouin, D., & van der Vleuten, C. (2002). Comparison of an aggregate scoring method with a consensus scoring method in a measure of clinical reasoning capacity. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 14(3), 150–156. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328015TLM1403_3
Chicago
Charlin, Bernard, Martin Desaulniers, Robert Gagnon, Daniel Blouin, and Cees van der Vleuten. 2002. “Comparison of an Aggregate Scoring Method with a Consensus Scoring Method in a Measure of Clinical Reasoning Capacity.” Teaching and Learning in Medicine 14 (3): 150–56. doi:10.1207/S15328015TLM1403_3.