Comparison of a cultural method with ListerScreen plus Rapid'L.mono or PCR-ELISA methods for the enumeration of L. monocytogenes in naturally contaminated sewage sludge.

MLA

Garrec, N., et al. “Comparison of a Cultural Method with ListerScreen plus Rapid’L.Mono or PCR-ELISA Methods for the Enumeration of L. Monocytogenes in Naturally Contaminated Sewage Sludge.” Journal of Microbiological Methods, vol. 55, no. 3, Dec. 2003, pp. 763–73. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2003.08.011.

APA

Garrec, N., Dilasser, F., Pourcher, A. M., Perelle, S., & Fach, P. (2003). Comparison of a cultural method with ListerScreen plus Rapid’L.mono or PCR-ELISA methods for the enumeration of L. monocytogenes in naturally contaminated sewage sludge. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 55(3), 763–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2003.08.011

Chicago

Garrec, N, F Dilasser, A M Pourcher, S Perelle, and P Fach. 2003. “Comparison of a Cultural Method with ListerScreen plus Rapid’L.Mono or PCR-ELISA Methods for the Enumeration of L. Monocytogenes in Naturally Contaminated Sewage Sludge.” Journal of Microbiological Methods 55 (3): 763–73. doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2003.08.011.