Back to Search
Start Over
Impact of sublingual immunotherapy on seasonal asthma and skin reactivity in children allergic to Parietaria pollen treated with inhaled fluticasone propionate.
- Source :
-
Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology [Clin Exp Allergy] 2003 Dec; Vol. 33 (12), pp. 1641-7. - Publication Year :
- 2003
-
Abstract
- Background: Immunotherapy is a recognized treatment for allergic respiratory diseases.<br />Objective: To study the usefulness of immunotherapy in combination with optimal pharmacological therapy.<br />Methods: Thirty-eight children (8-14 years) suffering from seasonal asthma+/-rhinoconjunctivitis due to Parietaria poorly controlled by anti-allergic drugs treatment were selected. After randomization according to a double-blind placebo-controlled design they received active sublingual immunotherapy (15 children) or placebo (15 children) for 13 months combined with inhaled fluticasone twice a day during the pollen season. Eight children were taken as control, whereas all patients were instructed to take symptomatic drugs on need. Early and late skin response to the allergen were assessed in all patients before and after treatment. Drug and symptom scores, as well as visual analogue scores (VASs) and Parietaria pollen counts were assessed during the pollen season.<br />Results: Groups were well balanced for age, gender, early and late skin response before treatment. Four children dropped out, in one case in relationship with active sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) administration. Chest and nose symptoms, as well as drug scores and VASs were significantly better in both the active or placebo SLIT+fluticasone (S+F) as compared to the control group (P between <0.001 and 0.043). Eye symptoms were significantly better in the active S+F group as compared to control (P=0.025). The VASs were significantly better in the active S+F group as compared to the placebo S+F group (P=0.037). The early skin response decreased significantly in the active S+F group (P<0.001), whereas the late skin response changed significantly in all groups, with an increase in the placebo+fluticasone group (P=0.019) and in the control group (P=0.037) and a decrease (P<0.0001) in the active S+F group.<br />Conclusion: The clinical efficacy of S+F is equal to that of fluticasone alone, but the addition of SLIT has effects also on non-bronchial symptoms.
- Subjects :
- Administration, Inhalation
Administration, Sublingual
Adolescent
Androstadienes therapeutic use
Anti-Allergic Agents therapeutic use
Asthma drug therapy
Asthma immunology
Child
Combined Modality Therapy
Double-Blind Method
Female
Fluticasone
Humans
Male
Parietaria
Pollen
Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal drug therapy
Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal immunology
Treatment Outcome
Allergens administration & dosage
Androstadienes administration & dosage
Anti-Allergic Agents administration & dosage
Asthma therapy
Desensitization, Immunologic methods
Plant Proteins administration & dosage
Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal therapy
Skin immunology
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 0954-7894
- Volume :
- 33
- Issue :
- 12
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 14656349
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.2003.01809.x