[Typology of the French medical learned societies. Survey of 129 organizations].

Introduction: A study on the relationship between the ANDEM--Agence Nationale pour le Développement de l'Evaluation Médicale (French agency for the development of health technology assessment) and the learned societies showed that a definition of the role of these organisations and criteria to define learned societies were lacking. We conducted a survey among the learned societies in the field of medicine so as to elaborate a definition.
Methods: We used the files of the learned societies of the Anaes--Agence Nationale d'Accréditation et d'Evaluation en Santé (French Agency for accreditation and evaluation in health) in 1998, which included 225 organisations. We sent a letter together with a single-page questionnaire and copies of the 2 publications on the relationship between the ANDEM and the learned societies. To analyse the suggestions for a definition, having read the replies, a segmentation of the population, the means and modalities of action and the aims and fields of action were used. A proposal for a definition was discussed during 2002/2003 with the board of the Fédération des Spécialités Médicales (FSM) (Federation of medical specialties) regrouping 33 medical and 12 surgical societies. Three meetings between a representative of the Anaes and the board of the FSM resulted in the proposition of so-called "validation" criteria for learned societies. A search on the French Internet listing such societies was made using a research motor (March 20, 2004).
Results: Out of the 225 organisations contacted, 129 (57%) replied. Among the latter, 115 considered themselves as a learned society and 14 did not. Among the 115 organisations defining themselves as a learned society, 97 proposed a definition, 16 made use of the definitions proposed in the questionnaire and 81 proposed their own definition. The analysis identified 6 important elements (reporting, knowledge, education, research, diffusion, promotion). The data analysed permitted the elaboration of a definition based on the proposals of the learned societies: "An organised group, within the framework of a given discipline, the members' aim of which is to report on their work, to improve knowledge on their discipline, to ensure education and research, to diffuse information on their work and research and to support and promote their discipline". Thirty-two of the 45 societies of the FSM accepted the 11 validation criteria proposed, some of which were commented on. Only one society abstained and 12 did not reply. No French Internet web site listing the learned societies specified a definition of criteria for inclusion in the lists.
Discussion: A definition of the learned societies and validation criteria, obtained through the participation of the principle actors, could serve as a basis for the recognition and identification of such societies.