Back to Search
Start Over
Accelerated versus conventional fractionated postoperative radiotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer: results of a multicenter Phase III study.
- Source :
-
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics [Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys] 2005 Mar 01; Vol. 61 (3), pp. 762-71. - Publication Year :
- 2005
-
Abstract
- Purpose: To determine whether, in the postoperative setting, accelerated fractionation (AF) radiotherapy (RT) yields a superior locoregional control rate compared with conventional fractionation (CF) RT in locally advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, or hypopharynx.<br />Methods and Materials: Patients from four institutions with one or more high-risk features (pT4, positive resection margins, pN >1, perineural/lymphovascular invasion, extracapsular extension, subglottic extension) after surgery were randomly assigned to either RT with one daily session of 2 Gy up to 60 Gy in 6 weeks or AF. Accelerated fractionation consisted of a "biphasic concomitant boost" schedule, with the boost delivered during the first and last weeks of treatment, to deliver 64 Gy in 5 weeks. Informed consent was obtained. The primary endpoint of the study was locoregional control. Analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis.<br />Results: From March 1994 to August 2000, 226 patients were randomized. At a median follow-up of 30.6 months (range, 0-110 months), 2-year locoregional control estimates were 80% +/- 4% for CF and 78% +/- 5% for AF (p = 0.52), and 2-year overall survival estimates were 67% +/- 5% for CF and 64% +/- 5% for AF (p = 0.84). The lack of difference in outcome between the two treatment arms was confirmed by multivariate analysis. However, interaction analysis with median values as cut-offs showed a trend for improved locoregional control for those patients who had a delay in starting RT and who were treated with AF compared with those with a similar delay but who were treated with CF (hazard ratio = 0.5, 95% confidence interval 0.2-1.1). Fifty percent of patients treated with AF developed confluent mucositis, compared with only 27% of those treated with CF (p = 0.006). However, mucositis duration was not different between arms. Although preliminary, actuarial Grade 3+ late toxicity estimates at 2 years were 18% +/- 4% and 27% +/- 6% for CF and AF, respectively (p = 0.10).<br />Conclusion: Accelerated fractionation does not seem to be worthwhile for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck after resection; however, AF might be an option for patients who delay starting RT.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell surgery
Dose Fractionation, Radiation
Female
Humans
Hypopharyngeal Neoplasms radiotherapy
Hypopharyngeal Neoplasms surgery
Laryngeal Neoplasms surgery
Male
Middle Aged
Mouth Neoplasms surgery
Oropharyngeal Neoplasms radiotherapy
Oropharyngeal Neoplasms surgery
Pharyngeal Neoplasms surgery
Statistics as Topic
Treatment Failure
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell radiotherapy
Laryngeal Neoplasms radiotherapy
Mouth Neoplasms radiotherapy
Pharyngeal Neoplasms radiotherapy
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 0360-3016
- Volume :
- 61
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 15708255
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.07.682