Receptor protection studies comparing recombinant and native nicotinic receptors: Evidence for a subpopulation of mecamylamine-sensitive native alpha3beta4* nicotinic receptors.

MLA

Free, R.Benjamin, et al. “Receptor Protection Studies Comparing Recombinant and Native Nicotinic Receptors: Evidence for a Subpopulation of Mecamylamine-Sensitive Native Alpha3beta4* Nicotinic Receptors.” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 392, no. 1–2, Jan. 2006, pp. 135–39. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2005.09.002.

APA

Free, R. B., Kaser, D. J., Boyd, R. T., & McKay, D. B. (2006). Receptor protection studies comparing recombinant and native nicotinic receptors: Evidence for a subpopulation of mecamylamine-sensitive native alpha3beta4* nicotinic receptors. Neuroscience Letters, 392(1–2), 135–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2005.09.002

Chicago

Free, R Benjamin, Daniel J Kaser, R Thomas Boyd, and Dennis B McKay. 2006. “Receptor Protection Studies Comparing Recombinant and Native Nicotinic Receptors: Evidence for a Subpopulation of Mecamylamine-Sensitive Native Alpha3beta4* Nicotinic Receptors.” Neuroscience Letters 392 (1–2): 135–39. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2005.09.002.