Back to Search Start Over

Mini-cardiopulmonary bypass system: results of a prospective randomized study.

Authors :
Beghi C
Nicolini F
Agostinelli A
Borrello B
Budillon AM
Bacciottini F
Friggeri M
Costa A
Belli L
Battistelli L
Gherli T
Source :
The Annals of thoracic surgery [Ann Thorac Surg] 2006 Apr; Vol. 81 (4), pp. 1396-400.
Publication Year :
2006

Abstract

Background: We studied postoperative mortality and morbidity after coronary artery bypass graft surgery performed using the mini-extracorporeal circulation (MECC) system.<br />Methods: From June 2001 to June 2002, we randomly enrolled 60 patients who underwent isolated elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and were operated on with the MECC system (30 patients: group A) or standard cardiopulmonary bypass (30 patients: group B). Serial blood samples were collected to evaluate the main preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative clinical and biological variables; and to measure hemolysis, interleukin-6 cytokine, and plasma C-reactive protein release.<br />Results: A more stable hemoglobin level was detected in group A. The platelet count did not show a significant difference between the two groups. Interleukin-6 cytokine release showed higher values in group B, although no difference between groups was statistically significant. The time course of circulating plasma C-reactive protein concentration exhibited the same increase in both groups. Plasma free hemoglobin levels showed higher hemolysis peaks in group B, although a statistical significant difference was detected only at 4 hours after surgery. A higher cardiac index and reduced systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance index in the early postoperative period were found in group A at postoperative time 30 minutes.<br />Conclusions: Our experience shows that MECC offers satisfactory clinical benefits in terms of good hemodynamic support, safety, and low morbidity, although the study failed to demonstrate a significant clear superiority of MECC versus conventional cardiopulmonary bypass. The results need to be confirmed by a larger prospective, randomized study comparing MECC and standard cardiopulmonary bypass.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1552-6259
Volume :
81
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The Annals of thoracic surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
16564279
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.10.015