Back to Search Start Over

Use of patient flow analysis to improve patient visit efficiency by decreasing wait time in a primary care-based disease management programs for anticoagulation and chronic pain: a quality improvement study.

Authors :
Potisek NM
Malone RM
Shilliday BB
Ives TJ
Chelminski PR
DeWalt DA
Pignone MP
Source :
BMC health services research [BMC Health Serv Res] 2007 Jan 15; Vol. 7, pp. 8. Date of Electronic Publication: 2007 Jan 15.
Publication Year :
2007

Abstract

Background: Patients with chronic conditions require frequent care visits. Problems can arise during several parts of the patient visit that decrease efficiency, making it difficult to effectively care for high volumes of patients. The purpose of the study is to test a method to improve patient visit efficiency.<br />Methods: We used Patient Flow Analysis to identify inefficiencies in the patient visit, suggest areas for improvement, and test the effectiveness of clinic interventions.<br />Results: At baseline, the mean visit time for 93 anticoagulation clinic patient visits was 84 minutes (+/- 50 minutes) and the mean visit time for 25 chronic pain clinic patient visits was 65 minutes (+/- 21 minutes). Based on these data, we identified specific areas of inefficiency and developed interventions to decrease the mean time of the patient visit. After interventions, follow-up data found the mean visit time was reduced to 59 minutes (+/-25 minutes) for the anticoagulation clinic, a time decrease of 25 minutes (t-test 39%; p < 0.001). Mean visit time for the chronic pain clinic was reduced to 43 minutes (+/- 14 minutes) a time decrease of 22 minutes (t-test 34 %; p < 0.001).<br />Conclusion: Patient Flow Analysis is an effective technique to identify inefficiencies in the patient visit and efficiently collect patient flow data. Once inefficiencies are identified they can be improved through brief interventions.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1472-6963
Volume :
7
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
BMC health services research
Publication Type :
Editorial & Opinion
Accession number :
17224069
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-7-8