Back to Search
Start Over
"Between the fixed and the changing": examining and comparing reliability and validity of 3 sedation-agitation measuring scales.
- Source :
-
Dimensions of critical care nursing : DCCN [Dimens Crit Care Nurs] 2007 Mar-Apr; Vol. 26 (2), pp. 76-82. - Publication Year :
- 2007
-
Abstract
- The goal of the study was to compare the reliability and validity of 3 Sedation Agitation Scale. Two nurses and a physician conducted 130 observations simultaneously. They found an excellent interrater reliability in the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (r>0.86), and high correlations between the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale and the Sedation Agitation Scale and Visual Analog Scale scales (r=0.92, r=0.85). The research findings will help to assert Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale as a daily assessment tool in the intensive care unit, and it will pave the way for construction a sedation protocol according to the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale level.
- Subjects :
- Analysis of Variance
Clinical Protocols
Conscious Sedation adverse effects
Conscious Sedation methods
Critical Care methods
Drug Monitoring methods
Drug Monitoring standards
Female
Glasgow Coma Scale standards
Humans
Israel
Male
Middle Aged
Nursing Assessment standards
Nursing Evaluation Research
Observer Variation
Psychomotor Agitation classification
Psychomotor Agitation prevention & control
Sensitivity and Specificity
Severity of Illness Index
Statistics, Nonparametric
Translating
Conscious Sedation nursing
Drug Monitoring nursing
Nursing Assessment methods
Psychomotor Agitation diagnosis
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 0730-4625
- Volume :
- 26
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Dimensions of critical care nursing : DCCN
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 17312412
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00003465-200703000-00010