Back to Search Start Over

Using assessing care of vulnerable elders quality indicators to measure quality of hospital care for vulnerable elders.

Authors :
Arora VM
Johnson M
Olson J
Podrazik PM
Levine S
Dubeau CE
Sachs GA
Meltzer DO
Source :
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society [J Am Geriatr Soc] 2007 Nov; Vol. 55 (11), pp. 1705-11.
Publication Year :
2007

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the quality of care for hospitalized vulnerable elders using measures based on Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders (ACOVE) quality indicators (QIs).<br />Design: Prospective cohort study.<br />Setting: Single academic medical center.<br />Participants: Subjects aged 65 and older hospitalized on the University of Chicago general medicine inpatient service who were defined as vulnerable using the Vulnerable Elder Survey-13 (VES-13), a validated tool based on age, self-reported health, and functional status.<br />Measurements: Inpatient interview and chart review using ACOVE-based process-of-care measures referring to 16 QIs in general hospital care and geriatric-prevalent conditions (e.g., pressure ulcers, dementia, and delirium); adherence rates calculated for type of care process (screening, diagnosis, and treatment) and type of provider (doctor, nurse).<br />Results: Six hundred of 845 (71%) older patients participated. Of these, 349 (58%) were deemed vulnerable based on VES-13 score. Three hundred twenty-eight (94%) charts were available for review. QIs for general medical care were met at a significantly higher rate than for pressure ulcer care (81.5%, 95% confidence interval (CI)=79.3-83.7% vs 75.8%, 95% CI=70.5-81.1%, P=.04) and for delirium and dementia care (81.5%, 95% CI=79.3-83.7 vs 31.4% 95% CI=27.5-35.2%, P<.01). According to standard nursing assessment forms, nurses were responsible for high rates of adherence to certain screening indicators (pain, nutrition, functional status, pressure ulcer risk; P<.001 when compared with physicians), although in patients with functional limitations, nurse admission assessments of functional limitations often did not agree with reports of limitations by patients on admission.<br />Conclusion: Adherence to geriatric-specific QIs is lower than adherence to general hospital care QIs. Hospital care QIs that focus on screening may overestimate performance by detecting standard nursing or protocol-driven care.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1532-5415
Volume :
55
Issue :
11
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
17979894
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01444.x