Back to Search Start Over

Prevalence of dementia in Latin America, India, and China: a population-based cross-sectional survey.

Authors :
Llibre Rodriguez JJ
Ferri CP
Acosta D
Guerra M
Huang Y
Jacob KS
Krishnamoorthy ES
Salas A
Sosa AL
Acosta I
Dewey ME
Gaona C
Jotheeswaran AT
Li S
Rodriguez D
Rodriguez G
Kumar PS
Valhuerdi A
Prince M
Source :
Lancet (London, England) [Lancet] 2008 Aug 09; Vol. 372 (9637), pp. 464-74. Date of Electronic Publication: 2008 Jul 25.
Publication Year :
2008

Abstract

Background: Studies have suggested that the prevalence of dementia is lower in developing than in developed regions. We investigated the prevalence and severity of dementia in sites in low-income and middle-income countries according to two definitions of dementia diagnosis.<br />Methods: We undertook one-phase cross-sectional surveys of all residents aged 65 years and older (n=14 960) in 11 sites in seven low-income and middle-income countries (China, India, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Venezuela, Mexico, and Peru). Dementia diagnosis was made according to the culturally and educationally sensitive 10/66 dementia diagnostic algorithm, which had been prevalidated in 25 Latin American, Asian, and African centres; and by computerised application of the dementia criterion from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM IV). We also compared prevalence of DSM-IV dementia in each of the study sites with that from estimates in European studies.<br />Findings: The prevalence of DSM-IV dementia varied widely, from 0.3% (95% CI 0.1-0.5) in rural India to 6.3% (5.0-7.7) in Cuba. After standardisation for age and sex, DSM-IV prevalence in urban Latin American sites was four-fifths of that in Europe (standardised morbidity ratio 80 [95% CI 70-91]), but in China the prevalence was only half (56 [32-91] in rural China), and in India and rural Latin America a quarter or less of the European prevalence (18 [5-34] in rural India). 10/66 dementia prevalence was higher than that of DSM-IV dementia, and more consistent across sites, varying between 5.6% (95% CI 4.2-7.0) in rural China and 11.7% (10.3-13.1) in the Dominican Republic. The validity of the 847 of 1345 cases of 10/66 dementia not confirmed by DSM-IV was supported by high levels of associated disability (mean WHO Disability Assessment Schedule II score 33.7 [SD 28.6]).<br />Interpretation: As compared with the 10/66 dementia algorithm, the DSM-IV dementia criterion might underestimate dementia prevalence, especially in regions with low awareness of this emerging public-health problem.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1474-547X
Volume :
372
Issue :
9637
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Lancet (London, England)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
18657855
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61002-8