Back to Search
Start Over
Automated versus manual blood pressure measurement: a randomized crossover trial.
- Source :
-
International journal of nursing practice [Int J Nurs Pract] 2008 Aug; Vol. 14 (4), pp. 296-302. - Publication Year :
- 2008
-
Abstract
- This study evaluated the accuracy and reliability of the Dinamap 8100 automated blood pressure machine against three internationally recognized criteria. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were taken concurrently by two nurses using the automated machine and a manual sphygmomanometer. Results demonstrated agreement between automated and manual readings on one set of criteria for both systolic and diastolic pressures, and support for systolic readings only on one other criterion. Comparison of mean differences between automated and manual measures showed the automated machine consistently under-read both systolic and diastolic blood pressures. The conclusion from this study was that the Dinamap 8100 machine can be used with some degree of confidence to assess systolic blood pressures in a general population of adult hospital inpatients, but with caution when taking diastolic readings.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Australia
Blood Pressure Determination methods
Blood Pressure Monitors
Cross-Over Studies
Female
Humans
Hypertension nursing
Male
Middle Aged
Observer Variation
Pilot Projects
Probability
Reference Values
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Blood Pressure Determination instrumentation
Hypertension diagnosis
Sphygmomanometers
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1440-172X
- Volume :
- 14
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- International journal of nursing practice
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 18715391
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-172X.2008.00696.x