Back to Search Start Over

Clinical tolerance and efficacy of capryloyl salicylic acid peel compared to a glycolic acid peel in subjects with fine lines/wrinkles and hyperpigmented skin.

Authors :
Oresajo C
Yatskayer M
Hansenne I
Source :
Journal of cosmetic dermatology [J Cosmet Dermatol] 2008 Dec; Vol. 7 (4), pp. 259-62.
Publication Year :
2008

Abstract

Background: Several chemical agents are currently used to perform superficial peels of the face to reduce facial hyperpigmentation and fine lines/wrinkles. Some of the most commonly used agents are alpha hydroxyl acids, such as glycolic acid (GA), or beta hydroxy acid, such as salicylic acid.<br />Aim: This study aims to compare the efficacy of GA to that of a novel derivative of salicylic acid, capryloyl salicylic acid (LHA).<br />Subjects/methods: In a split-face study, 50 female volunteers between the ages of 35 and 60 years with mild to moderate facial hyperpigmentation and fine lines/wrinkles were randomized and LHA or GA peel was applied to one side of the face. Increasing peel concentrations were applied (5-10% LHA or 20-50% GA) based on the tolerance level of the subjects and clinical observations of an expert dermatologist for 12 weeks at biweekly intervals.<br />Results: Of the 44 volunteers who completed the study, at 12 weeks 41% of LHA-treated and 30% of GA-treated subjects demonstrated significant reduction of fine lines/wrinkles compared to baseline. Forty-six percent of LHA-treated subjects and 34% of GA-treated subjects showed significant reduction of hyperpigmentation compared to baseline. LHA treatment was better than GA peels, although there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups.<br />Conclusions: Five percent to 10% of LHA peel is generally safe and as effective as 20-50% GA peel in reducing facial hyperpigmentation and fine lines/wrinkles.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1473-2165
Volume :
7
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of cosmetic dermatology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
19146601
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-2165.2008.00403.x