Back to Search Start Over

Lymph node metastasis in intermediate-risk penile squamous cell cancer: a two-centre experience.

Authors :
Hughes BE
Leijte JA
Kroon BK
Shabbir MA
Swallow TW
Heenan SD
Corbishley CM
van Boven HH
Perry MJ
Watkin NA
Horenblas S
Source :
European urology [Eur Urol] 2010 Apr; Vol. 57 (4), pp. 688-92. Date of Electronic Publication: 2009 Jul 17.
Publication Year :
2010

Abstract

Background: The risk of lymph node (LN) metastasis in G2T1 penile cancer has been previously reported as 0-50% and is classified as "intermediate" in the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines. The management of impalpable regional nodes in this cohort of patients remains contentious and varies among treatment centres depending on tumour factors and local resources.<br />Objectives: To establish the risk of LN metastasis in G2T1 disease.<br />Design, Settings, and Participants: We interrogated the databases of two referral centres for penile cancer.<br />Measurements: Out of 902 patients, 117 (13%) patients were identified with G2T1 cancers. Those with palpable inguinal nodes (cN1) underwent early inguinal LN dissection (iLND). Those with clinically node negative (cN0) inguinal basins were either observed or surgically staged with iLND or by dynamic sentinel LN biopsy (DSLNB). Median follow-up was 44 mo, with minimum follow-up of 6 mo.<br />Results and Limitations: Fifteen of 117 (13%) patients with G2T1 cancer had LN metastasis at initial staging or during follow-up. Six of 12 (50%) cN1 patients had histologically proven LN metastasis on iLND. One hundred five patients were cN0 at presentation. Ten cN0 patients had prophylactic iLND, none of which yielded LN metastasis; 5 of 64 (8%) cN0 patients who had DSLNB had tumour-positive LNs, and 4 of 31 (13%) cN0 patients who were observed developed LN metastasis during follow-up. In cN0 patients, the risk of LN metastasis at initial staging or during surveillance was 9%.<br />Conclusions: We consider that in cN0 patients with G2T1 penile cancer, the risk of developing metastases during surveillance warrants surgical and potentially curative staging. However, the morbidity of prophylactic bilateral iLND is too great to justify a detection rate of 9%. Less morbid alternatives such as DSLNB are advisable in G2T1 disease.<br /> (Copyright © 2009 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1873-7560
Volume :
57
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
European urology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
19647926
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2009.07.004