Back to Search Start Over

Comparison between fixed-dose, intracoronary bolus-only versus standard weight-adjusted dose, intravenous bolus and infusion administration of abciximab in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors :
Lee CH
Ngo HM
Sewianto A
Nguyen TH
Lee J
Teo SG
Low AF
Tan HC
Source :
International journal of cardiology [Int J Cardiol] 2010 Nov 19; Vol. 145 (2), pp. 355-357. Date of Electronic Publication: 2010 Mar 15.
Publication Year :
2010

Abstract

We studied the safety and effectiveness of fixed-dose, intracoronary bolus-only abciximab in 195 patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. The patients were divided into 2 groups: Group A (n=120, 61.5%) received fixed-dose, intracoronary bolus-only, abciximab 10 mg; and Group B (n=75, 38.5%) received standard intravenous bolus (0.25 mg/kg) and maintenance abciximab infusion of 0.125 μg/kg/min for 12 h. There was no statistically significant difference in the baseline and post-procedure TIMI flow between Groups A and B. Final TIMI 3 flow was achieved in 90.0% and 89.3% of the patients in Groups A and B, respectively (p=0.14). Final TIMI myocardial perfusion grade 2/3 was achieved in 92.5% and 96.0% of the patients in Groups A and B, respectively (p=0.45). The six-month clinical outcomes were similar between Groups A and B (8.3% versus 5.3%, p=0.62).<br /> (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1874-1754
Volume :
145
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
International journal of cardiology
Publication Type :
Report
Accession number :
20227778
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.02.017