Back to Search Start Over

Identifying patient information needs about cancer clinical trials using a Question Prompt List.

Authors :
Brown RF
Shuk E
Butow P
Edgerson S
Tattersall MH
Ostroff JS
Source :
Patient education and counseling [Patient Educ Couns] 2011 Jul; Vol. 84 (1), pp. 69-77. Date of Electronic Publication: 2010 Aug 02.
Publication Year :
2011

Abstract

Objective: Question Prompt Lists (QPLs) have demonstrated significant promise in facilitating communication in general, surgical and palliative oncology settings yet have not been tested in the oncology clinical trial setting. We aimed to develop a targeted QPL for Clinical Trials (QPL-CT).<br />Methods: Breast, lung, and genitourinary cancer patients who either had (trial experienced) or had not (trial naive) participated in a clinical trial joined focus groups to help develop and explore the acceptability of a QPL-CT. Clinicians also participated in separated focus groups. Focus groups were audio-recorded and transcribed. We explored patients' trial information needs and views about the utility of the QPL-CT.<br />Results: Patients focused on four trial information needs: understanding foundational information, conflict of interest issues and financial implications of trial participation. Of note, experienced patients need to personalize foundational information.<br />Conclusion: Patient information needs varied considerably and were influenced by trial experience. Patients valued the QPL-CT as an aid to gathering new trial information and ensuring that their information needs were met.<br />Practice Implications: Physicians need to carefully elicit patient information needs and tailor trial information to meet these needs. The QPL-CT, may be of great benefit during clinical trial discussions.<br /> (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1873-5134
Volume :
84
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Patient education and counseling
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
20675095
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2010.07.005