Back to Search Start Over

Assessing nonresponse bias at follow-up in a large prospective cohort of relatively young and mobile military service members.

Authors :
Littman AJ
Boyko EJ
Jacobson IG
Horton J
Gackstetter GD
Smith B
Hooper T
Wells TS
Amoroso PJ
Smith TC
Source :
BMC medical research methodology [BMC Med Res Methodol] 2010 Oct 21; Vol. 10, pp. 99. Date of Electronic Publication: 2010 Oct 21.
Publication Year :
2010

Abstract

Background: Nonresponse bias in a longitudinal study could affect the magnitude and direction of measures of association. We identified sociodemographic, behavioral, military, and health-related predictors of response to the first follow-up questionnaire in a large military cohort and assessed the extent to which nonresponse biased measures of association.<br />Methods: Data are from the baseline and first follow-up survey of the Millennium Cohort Study. Seventy-six thousand, seven hundred and seventy-five eligible individuals completed the baseline survey and were presumed alive at the time of follow-up; of these, 54,960 (71.6%) completed the first follow-up survey. Logistic regression models were used to calculate inverse probability weights using propensity scores.<br />Results: Characteristics associated with a greater probability of response included female gender, older age, higher education level, officer rank, active-duty status, and a self-reported history of military exposures. Ever smokers, those with a history of chronic alcohol consumption or a major depressive disorder, and those separated from the military at follow-up had a lower probability of response. Nonresponse to the follow-up questionnaire did not result in appreciable bias; bias was greatest in subgroups with small numbers.<br />Conclusions: These findings suggest that prospective analyses from this cohort are not substantially biased by non-response at the first follow-up assessment.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1471-2288
Volume :
10
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
BMC medical research methodology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
20964861
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-99