Back to Search Start Over

[Which breast reconstruction procedure provides the best long-term satisfaction?].

Authors :
Bodin F
Zink S
Lutz JC
Kadoch V
Wilk A
Bruant-Rodier C
Source :
Annales de chirurgie plastique et esthetique [Ann Chir Plast Esthet] 2010 Dec; Vol. 55 (6), pp. 547-52. Date of Electronic Publication: 2010 Oct 30.
Publication Year :
2010

Abstract

Introduction: Patient satisfaction is a good indicator to evaluate the success of breast reconstruction. The aim of this study was to compare the long-term satisfaction in patients who underwent four breast reconstruction techniques.<br />Patient and Methods: Self-evaluation was achieved by patients in 147 breast reconstructions using a four-point score: very disappointed, disappointed, satisfied and very satisfied. The mean follow-up was 5.3 year (1 to 21.5 year). The surgical procedures used were: transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap (TRAM) 15%, autologous latissimus dorsi flap (ALD) 14%, latissimus dorsi flap with implant (LDI) 32% and implant alone 39%. Patients' satisfaction was compared regarding the type of surgical procedure, the postoperative follow-up time; the immediate or delayed breast reconstruction and the radiation history.<br />Results: Thirty-five percent of the patients were very satisfied with their operation, 54% were satisfied, 7% were disappointed and 4% very disappointed. After a 5-year follow-up, autologous flaps showed better results (P<0.001). Patients were more satisfied with TRAM flaps than with surgical techniques using latissimus dorsi flaps (ALD and LDI). Patients treated with implants alone were statistically less satisfied. Only in the implant series, patient satisfaction decreased significantly with time (P<0.001) and preoperative radiation (P=0.005).<br />Conclusions: Flap-based breast reconstructions show consistent long-term satisfaction although the surgery is initially more demanding. Our study matches the latest trends in the use of free perforator flaps for breast reconstruction. Indeed, these procedures combine good satisfaction and minor sequelae at the donor site.<br /> (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
French
ISSN :
1768-319X
Volume :
55
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Annales de chirurgie plastique et esthetique
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
21036446
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anplas.2010.09.013