Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of antiemetic efficacy between single and repeat treatment with dexamethasone in patients receiving carboplatin-based combination chemotherapy.

Authors :
Kawazoe H
Motoki Y
Takechi Y
Shishino Y
Ido K
Suemaru K
Araki H
Source :
Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology [Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol] 2010 Sep; Vol. 32 (7), pp. 499-505.
Publication Year :
2010

Abstract

A retrospective study was carried out to compare the preventive effects of single and repeat treatment with dexamethasone (DEX) on delayed nausea and emesis in patients who had received carboplatin (CBDCA)-based combination chemotherapy. Sixty-four patients were evaluated. Efficacy was assessed using the nausea and emesis score, food intake score and the requirement for antiemetic medication. These forward scores were categorized as three-grade during the first 5 days after chemotherapy. Acute nausea and emesis were well controlled in both groups on day 1. Mean values of the nausea and emesis score on day 3 evening and the food intake score on day 4 morning in the repeat-treatment group was 1.31 ± 0.93 and 3.46 ± 1.03, respectively, which were significantly better when compared with the single-treatment group (2.00 ± 1.52; P = 0.028 and 2.79 ± 1.12; P = 0.018, respectively). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that less frequent dispensing of antiemetic medication was significantly associated with the repeat-treatment group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.153; 95% confidence interval, 0.026-0.734; P = 0.018). These results suggest that repeat-dose DEX may be more effective than single-dose DEX for the prevention of delayed nausea and emesis after CBDCA-based combination chemotherapy.<br /> (Copyright 2010 Prous Science, S.A.U. or its licensors. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0379-0355
Volume :
32
Issue :
7
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
21069101
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1358/mf.2010.32.7.1501438