Back to Search Start Over

Evaluation of kV cone-beam ct performance for prostate IGRT: a comparison of automatic grey-value alignment to implanted fiducial-marker alignment.

Authors :
Shi W
Li JG
Zlotecki RA
Yeung A
Newlin H
Palta J
Liu C
Chvetsov AV
Olivier K
Source :
American journal of clinical oncology [Am J Clin Oncol] 2011 Feb; Vol. 34 (1), pp. 16-21.
Publication Year :
2011

Abstract

Purpose: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is a new image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) technique for patient alignment in radiotherapy. The CBCT x-ray volume imaging system from Elekta allows for a variety of alignment methods. The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of soft-tissue-based automatic alignment as compared with manual alignment using intraprostatic fiducials.<br />Methods and Materials: All patients were treated on an Elekta Synergy S linear accelerator with kilovoltage CBCT. All alignments were performed using the x-ray volume imaging system and associated software. Automatic alignment with gray-value-based registration and manual alignment to fiducial markers were performed. Transitional corrections along each axis as well as 3-dimensional vectors were compared with evaluate the accuracy of gray-value-based registration compared with fiducials.<br />Results: The distribution of the 3-dimensional vectors between gray-value and fiducial registrations demonstrated notable differences. The mean summed vector was 0.75 cm, with a standard deviation (SD) of 0.52 cm and range from 0.04 to 2.06 cm. There was minimal difference along the lateral direction, with a mean ± SD of -0.02 cm ± 0.13 cm. However, there were large discrepancies along the superior-inferior and anterior-posterior direction alignments, with mean ± SD values of -0.55 ± 0.48 cm and -0.31 ± 0.43 cm, respectively.<br />Conclusions: CBCT with soft-tissue-based automatic corrections is not an accurate alignment compared with manual alignment to fiducial markers for prostate IGRT. We have concluded that a daily manual alignment to fiducials is one of the most reliable methods to maintain accuracy in prostate IGRT.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1537-453X
Volume :
34
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
American journal of clinical oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
21189455
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0b013e3181d26b1a