Back to Search
Start Over
Multifactorial approach to predicting resistance to anthracyclines.
- Source :
-
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology [J Clin Oncol] 2011 Apr 20; Vol. 29 (12), pp. 1578-86. Date of Electronic Publication: 2011 Mar 21. - Publication Year :
- 2011
-
Abstract
- Purpose: Validated biomarkers predictive of response/resistance to anthracyclines in breast cancer are currently lacking. The neoadjuvant Trial of Principle (TOP) study, in which patients with estrogen receptor (ER) -negative tumors were treated with anthracycline (epirubicin) monotherapy, was specifically designed to evaluate the predictive value of topoisomerase II-α (TOP2A) and develop a gene expression signature to identify those patients who do not benefit from anthracyclines.<br />Patients and Methods: The TOP trial included 149 patients, 139 of whom were evaluable for response prediction analyses. The primary end point was pathologic complete response (pCR). TOP2A and gene expression profiles were evaluated using pre-epirubicin biopsies. Gene expression data from ER-negative samples of the EORTC (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer) 10994/BIG (Breast International Group) 00-01 and MDACC (MD Anderson Cancer Center) 2003-0321 neoadjuvant trials were used for validation purposes.<br />Results: A pCR was obtained in 14% of the evaluable patients in the TOP trial. TOP2A amplification, but not protein overexpression, was significantly associated with pCR (P ≤ .001 v P ≤ .33). We developed an anthracycline-based score (A-Score) combining three signatures: a TOP2A gene signature and two previously published signatures related to tumor invasion and immune response. The A-Score was characterized by a high negative predictive value ([NPV]; NPV, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.00) overall and in the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -negative and HER2-positive subpopulations. Its performance was independently confirmed in the anthracycline-based arms of the two validation trials (BIG 00-01: NPV, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.94 and MDACC 2003-0321: NPV, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.00).<br />Conclusion: Given its high NPV, the A-Score could become, if further validated, a useful clinical tool to identify those patients who do not benefit from anthracyclines and could therefore be spared the non-negligible adverse effects.
- Subjects :
- Antibiotics, Antineoplastic adverse effects
Antigens, Neoplasm analysis
Antigens, Neoplasm genetics
Biomarkers, Tumor analysis
Biopsy
Breast Neoplasms enzymology
Breast Neoplasms genetics
Breast Neoplasms pathology
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
DNA Topoisomerases, Type II analysis
DNA Topoisomerases, Type II genetics
DNA-Binding Proteins analysis
DNA-Binding Proteins antagonists & inhibitors
DNA-Binding Proteins genetics
Epirubicin adverse effects
Europe
Female
Gene Expression Profiling
Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic
Humans
Middle Aged
Neoadjuvant Therapy
Odds Ratio
Patient Selection
Poly-ADP-Ribose Binding Proteins
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Receptor, ErbB-2 analysis
Receptors, Estrogen analysis
Reproducibility of Results
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Texas
Treatment Failure
Antibiotics, Antineoplastic therapeutic use
Breast Neoplasms drug therapy
Drug Resistance, Neoplasm genetics
Epirubicin therapeutic use
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1527-7755
- Volume :
- 29
- Issue :
- 12
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 21422418
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2010.31.2231