Back to Search Start Over

Multicentre trial of a perioperative protocol to reduce mortality in patients with peptic ulcer perforation.

Authors :
Møller MH
Adamsen S
Thomsen RW
Møller AM
Source :
The British journal of surgery [Br J Surg] 2011 Jun; Vol. 98 (6), pp. 802-10. Date of Electronic Publication: 2011 Mar 25.
Publication Year :
2011

Abstract

Background: Morbidity and mortality rates in patients with perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) remain substantial. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of a multimodal and multidisciplinary perioperative care protocol on mortality in patients with PPU.<br />Methods: This was an externally controlled multicentre trial set in seven gastrointestinal departments in Denmark. Consecutive patients who underwent surgery for gastric or duodenal PPU between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2009 were treated according to a multimodal and multidisciplinary evidence-based perioperative care protocol. The 30-day mortality rate in this group was compared with rates in historical and concurrent national controls.<br />Results: The 30-day mortality rate following PPU was 17·1 per cent in the intervention group, compared with 27·0 per cent in the three control groups (P = 0·005). This corresponded to a relative risk of 0·63 (95 per cent confidence interval 0·41 to 0·97), a relative risk reduction of 37 (5 to 58) per cent and a number needed to treat of 10 (6 to 38).<br />Conclusion: The 30-day mortality rate in patients with PPU was reduced by more than one-third after the implementation of a multimodal and multidisciplinary perioperative care protocol, compared with conventional treatment.<br />Registration Number: NCT00624169 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).<br /> (Copyright © 2011 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1365-2168
Volume :
98
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The British journal of surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
21442610
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7429