Back to Search
Start Over
Outcomes of concomitant aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting at teaching hospitals versus nonteaching hospitals.
- Source :
-
The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery [J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg] 2012 Mar; Vol. 143 (3), pp. 648-55. Date of Electronic Publication: 2011 Jun 30. - Publication Year :
- 2012
-
Abstract
- Objective: Hospitals with a high volume and academic status produce better patient outcomes than other hospitals after complex surgical procedures. Risk models show that concomitant aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting pose a greater risk than isolated coronary artery bypass grafting or aortic valve replacement. We examined the relationship of hospital teaching status and the presence of a thoracic surgery residency program with aortic valve replacement/coronary artery bypass grafting outcomes.<br />Methods: By using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database, we identified patients who underwent concomitant aortic valve replacement/coronary artery bypass grafting from 1998 to 2007 at nonteaching hospitals, teaching hospitals without a thoracic surgery residency program, and teaching hospitals with a thoracic surgery residency program. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify intergroup differences. Risk-adjusted multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess independent predictors of in-hospital mortality and complication rates.<br />Results: The 3 groups of patients did not differ significantly in their baseline characteristics. Patients who underwent aortic valve replacement/coronary artery bypass grafting had higher overall risk-adjusted complication rates in nonteaching hospitals (odds ratio 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.39-1.80; P < .0001) and teaching hospitals without a thoracic surgery residency program (odds ratio 1.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-1.60; P < .0001) than in thoracic surgery residency program hospitals. However, no difference was observed in the adjusted mortality rate for nonteaching hospitals (odds ratio 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-1.04; P = .25) or teaching hospitals without a thoracic surgery residency program (odds ratio 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.08; P = .98) when compared with thoracic surgery residency program hospitals. Robust statistical models were used for analysis, with c-statistics of 0.98 (complications) and 0.82 (mortality).<br />Conclusion: Patients who require complex cardiac operations may have better outcomes when treated at teaching hospitals with a thoracic surgery residency program.<br /> (Copyright © 2012 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Coronary Artery Bypass adverse effects
Coronary Artery Bypass mortality
Female
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation adverse effects
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation mortality
Hospital Mortality
Humans
Logistic Models
Male
Middle Aged
Odds Ratio
Postoperative Complications etiology
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Thoracic Surgery statistics & numerical data
Treatment Outcome
United States epidemiology
Aortic Valve surgery
Coronary Artery Bypass education
Education, Medical, Graduate statistics & numerical data
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation education
Hospitals, Teaching statistics & numerical data
Internship and Residency statistics & numerical data
Thoracic Surgery education
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1097-685X
- Volume :
- 143
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 21719032
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.04.041