Back to Search
Start Over
Preventing pressure ulcers in long-term care: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
- Source :
-
Archives of internal medicine [Arch Intern Med] 2011 Nov 14; Vol. 171 (20), pp. 1839-47. Date of Electronic Publication: 2011 Sep 26. - Publication Year :
- 2011
-
Abstract
- Background: Pressure ulcers are common in many care settings, with adverse health outcomes and high treatment costs. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of evidence-based strategies to improve current prevention practice in long-term care facilities.<br />Methods: We used a validated Markov model to compare current prevention practice with the following 4 quality improvement strategies: (1) pressure redistribution mattresses for all residents, (2) oral nutritional supplements for high-risk residents with recent weight loss, (3) skin emollients for high-risk residents with dry skin, and (4) foam cleansing for high-risk residents requiring incontinence care. Primary outcomes included lifetime risk of stage 2 to 4 pressure ulcers, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and lifetime costs, calculated according to a single health care payer's perspective and expressed in 2009 Canadian dollars (Can$1 = US$0.84).<br />Results: Strategies cost on average $11.66 per resident per week. They reduced lifetime risk; the associated number needed to treat was 45 (strategy 1), 63 (strategy 4), 158 (strategy 3), and 333 (strategy 2). Strategy 1 and 4 minimally improved QALYs and reduced the mean lifetime cost by $115 and $179 per resident, respectively. The cost per QALY gained was approximately $78 000 for strategy 3 and $7.8 million for strategy 2. If decision makers are willing to pay up to $50 000 for 1 QALY gained, the probability that improving prevention is cost-effective is 94% (strategy 4), 82% (strategy 1), 43% (strategy 3), and 1% (strategy 2).<br />Conclusions: The clinical and economic evidence supports pressure redistribution mattresses for all long-term care residents. Improving prevention with perineal foam cleansers and dry skin emollients appears to be cost-effective, but firm conclusions are limited by the available clinical evidence.
- Subjects :
- Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Canada
Female
Health Care Costs
Humans
Immobilization adverse effects
Male
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Risk Factors
Severity of Illness Index
Beds economics
Beds standards
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Long-Term Care economics
Long-Term Care methods
Nutrition Therapy economics
Nutrition Therapy standards
Pressure Ulcer economics
Pressure Ulcer etiology
Pressure Ulcer prevention & control
Skin Care economics
Skin Care standards
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1538-3679
- Volume :
- 171
- Issue :
- 20
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Archives of internal medicine
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 21949031
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2011.473