Back to Search Start Over

Characterization of resident surgeon participation during carotid endarterectomy and impact on perioperative outcomes.

Authors :
Reeves JG
Kasirajan K
Veeraswamy RK
Ricotta JJ 2nd
Salam AA
Dodson TF
McClusky DA 3rd
Corriere MA
Source :
Journal of vascular surgery [J Vasc Surg] 2012 Jan; Vol. 55 (1), pp. 268-73. Date of Electronic Publication: 2011 Nov 01.
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

Introduction: The impact of resident surgeon participation during vascular procedures on postoperative outcomes is incompletely understood. We characterized resident physician participation during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) procedures within the 2005-2009 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Participant Use Datafile and evaluated associations with procedural characteristics and perioperative adverse events.<br />Methods: CEAs were identified using primary current procedural terminology codes; those performed simultaneously with other major procedures or unknown resident participation status were excluded. Group-wise comparisons based on resident participation status were performed using χ(2) or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and t tests or nonparametric methods for continuous variables. Associations with perioperative adverse events (major = stroke, death, myocardial infarction, or cardiac arrest; minor = peripheral nerve injury, bleeding requiring transfusion, surgical site infection, or wound disruption) were assessed using multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for other known risk factors.<br />Results: A total of 25,280 CEA procedures were analyzed, of which residents participated in 13,705 (54.2%), while residents were absent in 11,575 (45.8%). Among CEAs with resident physician participation, resident level was categorized as junior (postgraduate year [PGY] 1-2) in 21.9%, senior (PGY 3-5) in 52.7%, and fellow (PGY ≥6) in 25.3%. Major adverse event rates with and without resident participation were 1.9% versus 2.1%, and minor adverse event rates with and without resident participation were 0.9% versus 1.0%, respectively. In multivariable models, resident physician participation was not associated with perioperative risk for major adverse events (odds ratio [OR], 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-1.08) or minor adverse events (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.72-1.21).<br />Conclusions: Resident surgeon participation during CEA is not associated with risk of adverse perioperative events.<br /> (Published by Mosby, Inc.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1097-6809
Volume :
55
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of vascular surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
22051871
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2011.08.039