Back to Search Start Over

Multiple-electrode radiofrequency ablations using Octopus® electrodes in an in vivo porcine liver model.

Authors :
Lee ES
Lee JM
Kim WS
Choi SH
Joo I
Kim M
Yoo DH
Yoo RE
Han JK
Choi BI
Source :
The British journal of radiology [Br J Radiol] 2012 Sep; Vol. 85 (1017), pp. e609-15. Date of Electronic Publication: 2012 Mar 14.
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine the in vivo efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in porcine liver using Octopus® electrodes for creating a large coagulation compared with RFA using clustered electrodes.<br />Methods: A total of 39 coagulations were created using a 200-W generator and clustered electrodes or Octopus electrodes during laparotomy in 19 pigs. Radiofrequency was applied to the livers using four protocols: (1) Group A-1, monopolar mode using a clustered electrode (n=11); (2) Group A-2, monopolar mode using an Octopus electrode (n=11); (3) Group B-1, consecutive monopolar mode using three, clustered electrodes (n=8); and (4) Group B-2, switching monopolar mode using two Octopus electrodes (n=9). The energy efficiency, shape, diameters (D) and volume (V) of the coagulation volume were compared in each of the two groups.<br />Results: The mean maximum D and V of the coagulations in Group A-2 (4.7 cm and 33.1 cm(3), respectively) were significantly larger than those in Group A-1 (4.1 cm and 20.3 cm(3), respectively) (p<0.05). Furthermore, the mean minimum D, maximum D and V of the coagulations in Group B-2 were significantly larger than those in Group B-1, i.e. 5.3 vs 4.0 cm, 6.6 vs 4.9 cm and 66.9 vs 30.2 cm(3), respectively (p<0.05). The energy efficiencies were also significantly higher in Groups A-2 and B-2 than in Groups A-1 and B-1 (p<0.05).<br />Conclusion: The Octopus electrodes were more efficient for creating a large ablation zone than clustered electrodes, and the efficacy of RFA with Octopus electrodes can be amplified in the switching monopolar mode.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1748-880X
Volume :
85
Issue :
1017
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The British journal of radiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
22422385
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/61619687