Back to Search Start Over

IOM committee members respond to Endocrine Society vitamin D guideline.

Authors :
Rosen CJ
Abrams SA
Aloia JF
Brannon PM
Clinton SK
Durazo-Arvizu RA
Gallagher JC
Gallo RL
Jones G
Kovacs CS
Manson JE
Mayne ST
Ross AC
Shapses SA
Taylor CL
Source :
The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism [J Clin Endocrinol Metab] 2012 Apr; Vol. 97 (4), pp. 1146-52. Date of Electronic Publication: 2012 Mar 22.
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

In early 2011, a committee convened by the Institute of Medicine issued a report on the Dietary Reference Intakes for calcium and vitamin D. The Endocrine Society Task Force in July 2011 published a guideline for the evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency. Although these reports are intended for different purposes, the disagreements concerning the nature of the available data and the resulting conclusions have caused confusion for clinicians, researchers, and the public. In this commentary, members of the Institute of Medicine committee respond to aspects of The Endocrine Society guideline that are not well supported and in need of reconsideration. These concerns focus on target serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels, the definition of vitamin D deficiency, and the question of who constitutes a population at risk vs. the general population.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1945-7197
Volume :
97
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
22442278
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2011-2218